So I got my wife a Wii Fit Plus for Christmas this year and we’ve had a blast playing it. I want to go on the record as saying I am the snowball fight champion and the trick is to bob and weave a lot to throw off the other mii’s accuracy. But we’ll save video gaming tips for another blog entry.
Here’s the point of my blog entry today. The Wii Fit tells me I’m overweight. To add insult to injury, it made my little character have a big belly like I’m the front-runner for Santa at Macy’s next year.
I am 5’8″ and 168 pounds at 39 years old. It tells me my BMI is 25.5 and that makes me fat. It’s hard to know my revulsion to this notion without looking at me, but without any tinge of pride I have to say I don’t know a single person who would describe me as “the fat guy”. In fact, most 39 year olds I know wish they had my 33 inch waist and 70ish resting pulse.
So I start asking myself, where does the Wii Fit get off telling me I’m fat? It turns out that like in most cases where something really absurd is discovered, this is from the federal government.
Anyone else who is of enviable weight and waistline can go to the Centers for Disease Control website and be told you are fat also. This is a great consolation for me since even non-wii owners can be incensed like I am. (link)
Why does this matter? Because Democrats are just about to put the government in charge of your healthcare (including the provision that no future Congress can change it). Since their leader cornered the market on the word “audacity” it shouldn’t surprise us. I expect that the Health and Human Services guidelines on health care delivery will mirror their weight limits. Since the CDC site says “People who are overweight or obese are at higher risk for chronic conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol.”, I expect them to either micromanage my life to their moronic standard to “bend the cost curve” or find a way to punish me for being so abnormal.
There is some good news to all this. The Wii Fit says it will like me again if I get to 145 pounds. If I get there I’ll also get a free set of horned rim glasses and a lifetime supply of pocket protectors so I can fit in with all the other 5’8″, 145 pound geeks out there.
In an earlier post I compared how government run health care would look in America by comparing the Transportation Security Administration takeover of airport security screening. I had another experience this past week that concerns me more.
Like most men, I wear a belt. I wear the same belt when I travel because it doesn’t have a lot of metal on it. The first 20 times I wore the belt I got through security without any problem. Then one day the metal detector goes off. I ask a simple question to the TSA guy – any idea why this is going off when it has never done it before? His response is an annoyed “just take the belt off”. I took it off, got through security without further incident and expected that from then on I would have to do the extra step to help protect America from belts. Well on my flight home there were no problems with the belt and I wore it five or six more times before it went off again.
Why is this a problem? We TSA would be better because they would do a more consistent job across all airports. It simply isn’t the case. They are as inconsistent across the many airports I travel and the private people were before. The current promise is for “Universal Health Care”. That somehow the state marketplaces will set a specific standard and all of the sudden everyone will get the same treatment. How has that worked with the TSA? It hasn’t. The question is why hasn’t it?
Implementing the same standard across many locations is commonplace in many organizations. The difference between when a private organization does it and when a government organization does it is that the private organization’s local implementers get some benefit by going with the program. It may be more efficiency or better cost sharing or even just favor with their boss. When the government does it, it’s just related to someone in an ivory tower gaining more power for his or her own portfolio, not empowering local implementers or helping them achieve some benefit. That’s why TSA people, post office clerks and DMV employees are grumpy after changes occur. The changes almost never have any benefit for them. Even when the change is intended to benefit the “customer”, without any incentive to the local government employee, there’s no reason to care whether it is implemented well or not aside from personal work ethic which isn’t normally so high in these jobs (although I certainly have appreciated the few exceptions I have witnessed).
Americans are being lied to about how some kind of “Public Option” will benefit all people living in America equally. The reality is that the same variability you see in the TSA will happen in government health care. People will find out about it and stop going places where their “free” healthcare stinks, creating huge backlogs where it is actually good and all healthcare will suffer.